Suggestion and actually submitted a patch. The FSF emacs list has a attitude … for example, say someone made a
Aquamacs vs emacs code#
Many bugs, suggestions, even if accepted as better, but it is tremendouslyĭifficult to get code in or contribute. The very same issue crops up for a repeat of discussion with new comers.) In the end, typically nothing is done or changed, after years, and then Any discussion on User Interface is a immediateīomb shell, often spanning into hundreds of messages and debates. Messages about the cons/pro of freedom and legality issues (and that's
Of freedom … For example: in recent discussion about incorporating someĮmacs mode that hookup google services break out into tens or over a hundred Constantly half of the discussion is about FSF's concept In the list all seem to have to behave very sheepishly to conform to theĬulture there. (For example, polls) or systematic analysis. Of his emacs mode or distro, or any scientific basis such as social research Programing work and knowledge, or established factors such as user base Evaluation of opinions are not based on a person's existing SomeĪppear to be from just Emacs users who haven't coded elisp. In the mailing list, there's huge amounts of opinion throwing. No forum, no admin/management structure, no user profile, no image/file archive, no sitefeed updates, no integration with bug database, no integration with source code revision system, no who is online, etc. MHonArc, a Perl script that converts email texts to plain HTML the upload periodically to web server as static HTML pages.
Aquamacs vs emacs software#
(1999), then the web version is done by using the 1999's software In today's twitter, instant messaging, and voice and video chat days ( Skype, gtalk, msn, yahoo, aol …) that just about any joe uses to communicate across the globe, but GNU emacs dev stuck with the ancient mailing list software the The primary communication for GNU emacs dev is its There are so much obstacles and frustrations.
It just take years for a mode to get into GNU emacs even when the mode author is fully enthusiastic about it and willing to sign the paper and FSF willing to include it. Was discussed and i think paper signed perhaps 2 years ago but still not in GNU Emacs and i don't think it's even in the agenda … Js2-mode by Steve Yegge, and many other modes written by others … Mode, or code from Lennart's EmacsW32, or the incredibly non-trivial įSF does not want to bundle Visual Basic mode into emacs, even though it is top 5 most used lang. The links on the emacswiki seems to want to stick to sister sites such as instead of the much better quality Wikipedia. He doesn't want to switch to the much widely used and far more powerful For example, Alex Schroeder prefers to use his own wiki software the oddmuse. If FSF wants, FSF people could easily initiate the talk to Alex of emacswiki, so that emacswiki can function and provide many services emacs users need such as a coherent library depository, coherent online emacs interactive help center, or even a coherent emacs Web 2.0 social networking for emacs users … so many potentials.Įmacswiki has its own agenda. (See also: My Experience of Emacs vs XEmacs.) For example, many of its FAQ or pages and document could link XEmacs's years of superior tech going basicallyĭoesn't. Stand-alone and does not want to take in any other's work except FSF is kinda haughty in that it wants to be I think that it is difficult to get these all together, preciselyīecause one might say selfish motives, including myself. Or we could try to start a project in the wikimedia world.īut we need the support of the community. Perhaps you can cooperate with the maintainer of the emacswiki?
I think you should not create another micro-forum. I like your website and i am glad about your contributions, but The maintainer has no more spare time for the project. It should be possible to pass the admin-job to someone else, if One newsgroup with mirror to Mail (perhaps gmane?) would be fine.Īll services should not be bound to one individual. I would rather suggest to fusion some communication channels. There are many pages and most need more manpower. Possibly i could start a forum using WordPress. Also, i wish to keep the HTML valid, but i think that's hopeless. Am not sure what technology i can use with my hosted server to make it Web 2.0.
0 kommentar(er)
